On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 06:59:36AM -0500, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 01:59:18AM -0500, STeve Andre' wrote:
> > On Thursday 04 February 2010 01:44:15 Ted Unangst wrote:
> > > I haven't really solved the problem I want to solve, but was able to whip
> > > this up pretty quickly.  Basically, it's just a wrapper that runs a
> > > command and then starves it from running.  disknice is a misnomer, it also
> > > gets starved from cpu, but at the current time the only way to slow down a
> > > process's io is to stop it.  Not a complete solution, but it will slow
> > > down a large tar job to the point where other programs have plenty of time
> > > to get their requests in.  The sleep ratios should be tunable, aren't.
> > >
> > > > time disknice md5 -t
> > 
> > I'm definitely going to play with this.
> > 
> > To retard a process might be a better word, but might raise objections, 
> > so arrest, bridle or moderate might be better?
> > 
> > --STeve Andre'
> 
> 'filibuster' the process?

'healthily debate' the process, if you're in the US

> 
> .... Ken

Reply via email to