On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 01:20:32PM +0100, Bret S. Lambert wrote: > On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 06:59:36AM -0500, Kenneth R Westerback wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 01:59:18AM -0500, STeve Andre' wrote: > > > On Thursday 04 February 2010 01:44:15 Ted Unangst wrote: > > > > I haven't really solved the problem I want to solve, but was able to > > > > whip > > > > this up pretty quickly. Basically, it's just a wrapper that runs a > > > > command and then starves it from running. disknice is a misnomer, it > > > > also > > > > gets starved from cpu, but at the current time the only way to slow > > > > down a > > > > process's io is to stop it. Not a complete solution, but it will slow > > > > down a large tar job to the point where other programs have plenty of > > > > time > > > > to get their requests in. The sleep ratios should be tunable, aren't. > > > > > > > > > time disknice md5 -t > > > > > > I'm definitely going to play with this. > > > > > > To retard a process might be a better word, but might raise objections, > > > so arrest, bridle or moderate might be better? > > > > > > --STeve Andre' > > > > 'filibuster' the process? > > 'healthily debate' the process, if you're in the US > > > > > .... Ken > >
^C == cloture .... Ken
