On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 08:01:14PM +0000, x03 wrote:

> Hi misc@ ,
> 
> I have installed 4.6-stable in sd0.
> The partition structure and hd specs are this:
> 
> # disklabel
> sd0                                                                     
> # /dev/rsd0c:
> type: SCSI
> disk: da0s1
> label:
> flags:
> bytes/sector: 512
> sectors/track: 63
> tracks/cylinder: 255
> sectors/cylinder: 16065
> cylinders: 2213
> total sectors: 35565080
> rpm: 3600
> interleave: 1
> boundstart: 63
> boundend: 35551845
> drivedata: 0
> 
> 8 partitions:
> #                size           offset  fstype [fsize bsize  cpg]
>   a:         35540000               63  4.2BSD   2048 16384    1 # /
>   b:            11782         35540063    swap                  
>   c:         35565080                0  unused                  
> #
> 
> OK, the first thing strange here is the rpm value (3600).
> This SCSI disk have 15k rpm. How can I fix this? Or I have some hardware
> error?

The rpm value is ignored, and only is there for historic reasons. You
can edit it if you like by using the disklabel -E and then e. You might
need expert mode, don't remember if so atm. 

> 
> 
> I bought another hd, and is running with this specs:
> # disklabel sd1
> # /dev/rsd1c:
> type: SCSI
> disk: SCSI disk
> label: BD0186398C     
> flags:
> bytes/sector: 512
> sectors/track: 63
> tracks/cylinder: 255
> sectors/cylinder: 16065
> cylinders: 2213
> total sectors: 35565080
> rpm: 10000
> interleave: 1
> boundstart: 0
> boundend: 35565080
> drivedata: 0
> 
> 16 partitions:
> #                size           offset  fstype [fsize bsize  cpg]
>   c:         35565080                0  unused                  
>   i:            16002               63 unknown                  
> #
> 
> This one seems to have the correct rpm value. (this hd is 10k rpm actually).
> My question is, can i have software based raid0 with two different rpm
> values (the rest specs are the same)  ?
> If yes, can I do that with machine running and remotely?

No problem.

> 
> Tks a lot for your attention.

        -Otto

Reply via email to