On 2010-04-27, Michael W. Lucas <mwlu...@blackhelicopters.org> wrote: > Sendbug doesn't seem to have a "ports" option, and my bug report > doesn't have a single recommend solution in any case, so I'm asking > here.
po...@openbsd.org or the maintainer are generally your preferred options. > The flow-log2rrd, flow-rpt2rrd, and flow-rptfmt programs in flow-tools > each start with the line: How are you finding this out? flow-log2rrd and flow-rpt2rrd do not make it into the package. flow-rptfmt is correctly patched to use the system python, see the port Makefile. > I could argue that these should start with any of the following: > > #!/usr/bin/env python2.5 > #!/usr/local/bin/python2.5 > (repeat for python 2.4 and 2.6) > > So, what is the OpenBSD-style resolution for this sort of thing? $ head -1 /usr/local/bin/flow-rptfmt #!/usr/local/bin/python2.5 > Out of curiosity, is there any interest in a port of the new > flow-tools fork? It fixes many corruption bugs on 64-bit systems. URL?
