On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Theo de Raadt <dera...@cvs.openbsd.org> wrote: >> Independent of other problems, I don't think you should be using >> srandom. We should just take that interface away, people see it and >> then they want to use it, but it doesn't work the way they want. > > Taking it away would first require an extensive audit of the ports > tree -- to make sure that the applications in there don't end up > choosing something even *worse* than srandom...
I was just going to make it a symlink to arandom. :)
