> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Theo de Raadt <dera...@cvs.openbsd.org> w=
> rote:
> >> Independent of other problems, I don't think you should be using
> >> srandom. =A0We should just take that interface away, people see it and
> >> then they want to use it, but it doesn't work the way they want.
> >
> > Taking it away would first require an extensive audit of the ports
> > tree -- to make sure that the applications in there don't end up
> > choosing something even *worse* than srandom...
> 
> I was just going to make it a symlink to arandom.  :)

Ah!  That's a good idea.

Reply via email to