> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Theo de Raadt <dera...@cvs.openbsd.org> w= > rote: > >> Independent of other problems, I don't think you should be using > >> srandom. =A0We should just take that interface away, people see it and > >> then they want to use it, but it doesn't work the way they want. > > > > Taking it away would first require an extensive audit of the ports > > tree -- to make sure that the applications in there don't end up > > choosing something even *worse* than srandom... > > I was just going to make it a symlink to arandom. :)
Ah! That's a good idea.