> PayPal's terms of use do not permit soliciting crime. Wikileaks > solicits the > holders of US security clearances to violate their > non-disclosure agreements. > That is a crime.
Soliciting crimes is criminal activity, and therefor to be acted upon needs to be proved in court. Untill one is found guilty by court, any public occusations against him are considered defamation (criminal activity on it's own). So, according to legal regulations PayPal's activity towards Wikileaks account should be brought to court as a defamation case. Again: if PayPal things Wikileaks to be engaged in criminal activity, it should report such an activity (but not the details of such activity that became known to PayPal dew to it's contract with Wikileaks) to entitled public bodies and sit back waiting for a court's descision. -- Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
