I've run into this with t-online.de as well. I set up an operations web page 
just so they'd allow email from my MTA.

On Friday, August 1, 2025 4:43:54 AM CDT Tassilo Philipp wrote:
> One of my favorites from the last years was t-online.de (german
> telekom): mail from my server/IP was blocked by default, b/c I didn't
> have a website (!) under the same domain that provides some basic
> service provider info. Yes, a website is one of their requirements (4.1):
> https://postmaster.t-online.de/index.en.html#t4.1
> 
> They refer to an EU law, for justification, however the latter doesn't
> explicitly say website, and a whois is basically already more than
> enough.
> 
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 04:39:39PM +0000, INGHAM III, KENNETH wrote:
> > All the big email require proper SPF, DMARC and DKIM in most cases.  See,
> > for example, Email Authentication Changes: What Microsoft and Google Are
> > Enforcing (and What It Means for You) - Baskerville Drummond Consulting
> > LLP<https://baskervilledrummond.com/email_authentication_changes_what_mic
> > rosoft_and_google_are_enforcing/>
> > 
> > SPF is trivial to set up.  Some will argue with me, but DMARC and DKIM are
> > a pain to set up.  However, they (combined with SPF) are our best hope
> > for reducing forged email.
> > 
> > Kenneth
> > 
> > From: Stuart D Gathman <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2025 7:11 AM
> > To: Peter N. M. Hansteen <[email protected]>
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [vaguely OT] Looking for verified war stories of BIG MAIL
> > disappearing valid mail
> > 
> > On Thu, 31 Jul 2025, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote: > This message is the
> > start of an effort to research just how the BIG MAIL > operators treat
> > SMTP mail from small outfits like nxdomain. no and friends. Related
> > problem - 90% of the spam ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
> > This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
> > You have not previously corresponded with this sender.
> > 
> >    Report Suspicious 
> >    <https://us-phishalarm-ewt.proofpoint.com/EWT/v1/KGOTntw!SYrP0N8Vo9FRT
> >    1R1MHSlfUPCUBakO1-HIDTCC5cqHkiJhp-JceSXKkU-_1gJMTaK1oYi3C5EBOgod5d2EiO8
> >    yjxEXt2ldumdkkDf$>   ‌> 
> > ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
> > 
> > On Thu, 31 Jul 2025, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> >> This message is the start of an effort to research just how the BIG MAIL
> >> 
> >> operators treat SMTP mail from small outfits like nxdomain.no and
> >> friends.
> > 
> > Related problem - 90% of the spam on my email server is from gmail.
> > 
> > I need to make them whitelist only.  But need a system where senders
> > 
> > get a response telling them how to request whitelisting.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > These complementary problems are both the result of massive
> > 
> > centralization.  My "baby-step" advice to non-tech email users: "get
> > 
> > your own domain".  Even if you continue to use gmail or a smaller
> > 
> > provider (registrars generally offer reasonable personal email),
> > 
> > having your own domain means you can switch providers - letting
> > 
> > capitalism do its thing.  There is no such thing as "free" email.
> > 
> > You are paying for it one way or another.
> > 
> >> We have seen GOOG and to a lesser extent MSFT, YHOO mail exchangers seem
> >> to
> >> 
> >> accept messages from our domains for delivery, only to have them not turn
> >> 
> >> up in the intended inboxes after all or at best land in the users spam
> >> folders.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> I am pondering starting a campaign to collect war stories with as much
> >> log data
> >> 
> >> and other relevant data as possible in order to write an article which
> >> may
> >> 
> >> evolve to something else.
> > 
> > Microsoft often disappears emails from me to hotmail.  What kind of
> > 
> > documentation do you need?





Reply via email to