Source:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/02/white-house-land-grab/


The Washington Times
Originally published 06:15 p.m., March 2, 2010, updated 10:38 p.m., March 2,
2010

DEMINT: White House land grab
Proposal to seize land would favor animals over Americans

Sen. Jim DeMint

You'd think the Obama administration is busy enough controlling the banks,
insurance companies and automakers, but thanks to whistleblowers at the
Department of the Interior, we now learn they're planning to increase their
control over energy-rich land in the West.

A secret administration memo has surfaced revealing plans for the federal
government to seize more than 10 million acres from Montana to New Mexico,
halting job- creating activities like ranching, forestry, mining and energy
development. Worse, this land grab would dry up tax revenue that's essential
for funding schools, firehouses and community centers.

President Obama could enact the plans in this memo with just the stroke of a
pen, without any input from the communities affected by it.

At a time when our national unemployment rate is 9.7 percent, it is
unbelievable anyone would be looking to stop job-creating energy
enterprises, yet that's exactly what's happening.

The document lists 14 properties that, according to the document, "might be
good candidates" for Mr. Obama to nab through presidential proclamation.
Apparently, Washington bureaucrats believe it's more important to preserve
grass and rocks for birdwatchers and backpackers than to keep these local
economies thriving.

Administration officials claim the document is merely the product of a
brainstorming session, but anyone who reads this memo can see that it is a
wish list for the environmentalist left. It discusses, in detail, what kinds
of animal populations would benefit from limiting human activity in those
areas.

The 21-page document, marked "Internal Draft-NOT FOR RELEASE," names 14
different lands Mr. Obama could completely close for development by
unilaterally designating them as "monuments" under the 1906 Antiquities Act.

It says all kinds of animals would be better off by doing so, like the
coyotes, badgers, grouse, chickens and lizards. But giving the chickens more
room to roost is no reason for the government to override states' rights.

Rep. Robert Bishop, Utah Republican, made the memo public because he didn't
want another unilateral land grab by the White House, like what happened
under former Presidents Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter.

Using the Antiquities Act, President Carter locked up more land than any
other president had before him, taking more than 50 million acres in Alaska
despite strong opposition from the state.

President Clinton used the authority 22 times to prohibit hunting,
recreational vehicles, mining, forestry and even grazing in 5.9 million
acres scattered around the country. The law allowed him to single-handedly
create 19 new national monuments and expand three others without consulting
anyone.

One of the monuments President Clinton created was the Grande
Staircase-Escalante in Utah, where 135,000 acres of land were leased for oil
and gas and about 65,000 barrels of oil were produced each year from five
active wells. But, President Clinton put an end to developing those
resources.

President Obama could do the same in other energy-rich places unless
Congress takes action. At least 13.5 million acres are already on his
Department of Interior's real estate shopping list.

This includes a 58,000-acre area in New Mexico. The memo said this should be
done so the lesser prairie chicken and the sand dune lizard will be better
protected. Are these animals going extinct? No. The bureaucrats wrote that
the land should be locked up to "avoid the necessity of listing either of
these species as threatened or endangered."

In Nevada, the Obama administration might make another monument in the Heart
of the Great Basin because it, supposedly, is a "center of climate change
scientific research."

In Colorado, the government is considering designating the Vermillion Basin
as a monument because it is "currently under the threat of oil and gas
development."

Americans should be wary of any plans a president has to seize land from the
states without their consent. Any new plans to take away states' freedom to
use land as they see fit must be stopped.

That's why I sponsored an amendment to block Mr. Obama from declaring any of
the 14 lands listed in the memo as "monuments." Unfortunately, the Senate,
led by Democrats, rejected it on Thursday evening by a vote of 58-38.

It was particularly disappointing that the Senate Majority Leader Harry
Reid, of Nevada, voted against the amendment. The government owns more than
80 percent of the land in Nevada and the unemployment rate there is 12.8
percent. Surely it would help job prospects if more land were open for
business.

This is a nationwide problem. The government currently owns 650 million
acres, or 29 percent of the nation's total land.

Federal bureaucrats shouldn't be wasting time thinking up ways to acquire
more, especially in the middle of a recession. Taking the nation's resources
offline will stifle job creation and dry up tax revenues.

If anything, the government should be selling land off, not locking more up.
By voting against my amendment, the Democrats tacitly endorsed Mr. Obama's
secret plan to close off millions more acres to commerce.

If enacted, the plan would mean fewer jobs for Americans.

The Democratic Congress refused to stop it, but one sure way Americans could
help block it is if they decide some Democrats should lose their jobs on
November.

Sen. Jim DeMint, South Carolina Republican, is chairman of the U.S. Senate
Steering Committee, a caucus of conservative senators.

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Edward><+>

Once a victim,
Twice a volunteer,
Thrice an enabler.

http://www.global-connector.com
http://groups.google.com/group/transquesta/
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Christian_Universalism/
VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV


-- 
This is a Free Speech forum. The owner of this list assumes no
responsibility for the intellectual or emotional maturity of its members.
 If you do not like what is being said here, filter it to trash, ignore it
or leave.  If you leave, learn how to do this for yourself.  If you do not,
you will be here forever.

Leave this group by sending an empty message to
transquesta-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com

For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/transquesta?hl=en



-- 
"no cause is lost if there is but one fool to fight for it"
~Will Turner~
~Pirate's of the Caribbean @ World's End~

"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are
free." ~Goethe

www.moliberty.org

http://417-political-pundit.blogspot.com

The power to tax involves the power to destroy.
~Justice John Marshall~

Just because you do not take an interest in politics doesn't mean politics
won't take an interest in you!
-Pericles (430 B.C.)

A legislative act contrary to the Constitution is not law.
~Justice John Marshall~

-- 
This is a Free Speech forum. The owner of this list assumes no responsibility 
for the intellectual or emotional maturity of its members.  If you do not like 
what is being said here, filter it to trash, ignore it or leave.  If you leave, 
learn how to do this for yourself.  If you do not, you will be here forever.

Reply via email to