--- On Wed, 1/16/13, hrtl...@gmail.com <hrtl...@gmail.com> wrote:
#yiv611993208 v\00003a* {
}
As you can see, it is dangerous to even be around someone who is taking these
types of pharmaceuticals. They can wig out at any time. It is believed that
these drugs allow the takers' minds to be hijacked and controlled. If you
think our government does not have that technology, think again. They have
technology hundreds of years into the future that has not been released into
the private sector. I read about 20 yrs ago that they have the technology to
beam into our brains and see through our eyeballs..see what we are seeing. One
thing you can be sure of, whatever technologies they have, they use it for
their own personal gain and not for our benefit. These drones are not for our
benefit. None of it is. Keeping us "paralyzed" and subdued, benefits them,
not us.
THE GIANT, GAPING HOLE IN SANDY HOOK REPORTING
Exclusive: David Kupelian says 1 piece of crucial information has yet to be
disclosed
Since last month’s horrifying and heartbreaking school massacre in Newtown,
Conn., politicians and the press have, as everyone knows, been totally
obsessed with firearms.
Indeed, President Obama has vowed to impose strong new gun-control measures
on the nation – very soon, with or without Congress.
Other possible factors – from violent video games to the “failure of our
mental-health system” to the unintended consequences of making schools
“gun-free zones” – have taken a back seat to guns. Within hours of the
gruesome mega-crime, the media had provided extensive, round-the-clock
coverage of precisely which firearms, manufacturers and calibers the
perpetrator had used, how he had obtained them from his mother, where they
were originally purchased, and so on.
But where, I’d like to ask my colleagues in the media, is the reporting
about the psychiatric medications the perpetrator – who had been under
treatment for mental-health problems – may have been taking? After all, Mark
and Louise Tambascio, family friends of the shooter and his mother, were
interviewed on CBS’ “60 Minutes,” during which Louise Tambascio told
correspondent Scott Pelley: “I know he was on medication and everything, but
she homeschooled him at home cause he couldn’t deal with the school classes
sometimes, so she just homeschooled Adam at home. And that was her life.”
And here, Tambascio tells ABC News, “I knew he was on medication, but that’s
all I know.”
It has been more than three weeks since the shooting. We know all about the
guns he used, but what “medication” may he have used? (One brief mini-hoax
emerged when the New York Daily News published a story claiming the shooter,
according to his uncle, had been on the controversial antipsychotic drug
Fanapt. That story was quickly withdrawn after the “uncle” turned out to be
a fraudster with no relation to the murderer.)
So, what is the truth? Where is the journalistic curiosity? Where is the
follow-up? Where is the police report, the medical examiner’s report, the
interviews with his doctor and others?
Get autographed copies of both of David Kupelian’s classics: “The Marketing
of Evil” and “How Evil Works.”
But let me back up. Perhaps you’re wondering why this issue of psychiatric
medications should be so important.
As I documented in “How Evil Works,” it is simply indisputable that most
perpetrators of school shootings and similar mass murders in our modern era
were either on – or just recently coming off of – psychiatric medications:
Columbine mass-killer Eric Harris was taking Luvox – like Prozac, Paxil,
Zoloft, Effexor and many others, a modern and widely prescribed type of
antidepressant drug called selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, or
SSRIs. Harris and fellow student Dylan Klebold went on a hellish school
shooting rampage in 1999 during which they killed 12 students and a teacher
and wounded 24 others before turning their guns on themselves.Luvox
manufacturer Solvay Pharmaceuticals concedes that during short-term
controlled clinical trials, 4 percent of children and youth taking Luvox –
that’s 1 in 25 – developed mania, a dangerous and violence-prone mental
derangement characterized by extreme excitement and delusion.
Patrick Purdy went on a schoolyard shooting rampage in Stockton, Calif., in
1989, which became the catalyst for the original legislative frenzy to ban
“semiautomatic assault weapons” in California and the nation. The
25-year-old Purdy, who murdered five children and wounded 30, had been on
Amitriptyline, an antidepressant, as well as the antipsychotic drug
Thorazine.
Kip Kinkel, 15, murdered his parents in 1998 and the next day went to his
school, Thurston High in Springfield, Ore., and opened fire on his
classmates, killing two and wounding 22 others. He had been prescribed both
Prozac and Ritalin.
In 1988, 31-year-old Laurie Dann went on a shooting rampage in a
second-grade classroom in Winnetka, Ill., killing one child and wounding
six. She had been taking the antidepressant Anafranil as well as Lithium,
long used to treat mania.
In Paducah, Ky., in late 1997, 14-year-old Michael Carneal, son of a
prominent attorney, traveled to Heath High School and started shooting
students in a prayer meeting taking place in the school’s lobby, killing
three and leaving another paralyzed. Carneal reportedly was on Ritalin.
In 2005, 16-year-old Native American Jeff Weise, living on Minnesota’s Red
Lake Indian Reservation, shot and killed nine people and wounded five others
before killing himself. Weise had been taking Prozac.
In another famous case, 47-year-old Joseph T. Wesbecker, just a month after
he began taking Prozac in 1989, shot 20 workers at Standard Gravure Corp. in
Louisville, Ky., killing nine. Prozac-maker Eli Lilly later settled a
lawsuit brought by survivors.
Kurt Danysh, 18, shot his own father to death in 1996, a little more than
two weeks after starting on Prozac. Danysh’s description of own his
mental-emotional state at the time of the murder is chilling: “I didn’t
realize I did it until after it was done,” Danysh said. “This might sound
weird, but it felt like I had no control of what I was doing, like I was
left there just holding a gun.”
John Hinckley, age 25, took four Valium two hours before shooting and almost
killing President Ronald Reagan in 1981. In the assassination attempt,
Hinckley also wounded press secretary James Brady, Secret Service agent
Timothy McCarthy and policeman Thomas Delahanty.
Andrea Yates, in one of the most heartrending crimes in modern history,
drowned all five of her children – aged 7 years down to 6 months – in a
bathtub. Insisting inner voices commanded her to kill her children, she had
become increasingly psychotic over the course of several years. At her 2006
murder re-trial (after a 2002 guilty verdict was overturned on appeal),
Yates’ longtime friend Debbie Holmes testified: “She asked me if I thought
Satan could read her mind and if I believed in demon possession.” And Dr.
George Ringholz, after evaluating Yates for two days, recounted an
experience she had after the birth of her first child: “What she described
was feeling a presence … Satan … telling her to take a knife and stab her
son Noah,” Ringholz said, adding that Yates’ delusion at the time of the
bathtub murders was not only that she had to kill her children to save them,
but that Satan had entered her and that she had to be executed in order to
kill Satan.Yates had been taking the antidepressant Effexor. In November
2005, more than four years after Yates drowned her children, Effexor
manufacturer Wyeth Pharmaceuticals quietly added “homicidal ideation” to the
drug’s list of “rare adverse events.” The Medical Accountability Network, a
private nonprofit focused on medical ethics issues, publicly criticized
Wyeth, saying Effexor’s “homicidal ideation” risk wasn’t well-publicized and
that Wyeth failed to send letters to doctors or issue warning labels
announcing the change.And what exactly does “rare” mean in the phrase “rare
adverse events”? The FDA defines it as occurring in less than one in 1,000
people. But since that same year 19.2 million prescriptions for Effexor were
filled in the U.S., statistically that means thousands of Americans might
experience “homicidal ideation” – murderous thoughts – as a result of taking
just this one brand of antidepressant drug.Effexor is Wyeth’s best-selling
drug, by the way, which in one recent year brought in over $3 billion in
sales, accounting for almost a fifth of the company’s annual revenues.
One more case is instructive, that of 12-year-old Christopher Pittman, who
struggled in court to explain why he murdered his grandparents, who had
provided the only love and stability he’d ever known in his turbulent life.
“When I was lying in my bed that night,” he testified, “I couldn’t sleep
because my voice in my head kept echoing through my mind telling me to kill
them.” Christopher had been angry with his grandfather, who had disciplined
him earlier that day for hurting another student during a fight on the
school bus. So later that night, he shot both of his grandparents in the
head with a .410 shotgun as they slept and then burned down their South
Carolina home, where he had lived with them.”I got up, got the gun, and I
went upstairs and I pulled the trigger,” he recalled. “Through the whole
thing, it was like watching your favorite TV show. You know what is going to
happen, but you can’t do anything to stop it.”Pittman’s lawyers would later
argue that the boy had been a victim of “involuntary intoxication,” since
his doctors had him taking the antidepressants Paxil and Zoloft just prior
to the murders.Paxil’s known “adverse drug reactions” – according to the
drug’s FDA-approved label – include “mania,” “insomnia,” “anxiety,”
“agitation,” “confusion,” “amnesia,” “depression,” “paranoid reaction,”
“psychosis,” “hostility,” “delirium,” “hallucinations,” “abnormal thinking,”
“depersonalization” and “lack of emotion,” among others.The preceding
examples are only a few of the best-known offenders who had been taking
prescribed psychiatric drugs before committing their violent crimes – there
are many others.
Whether we like to admit it or not, it is undeniable that when certain
people living on the edge of sanity take psychiatric medications, those
drugs can – and occasionally do – push them over the edge into violent
madness. Remember, every single SSRI antidepressant sold in the United
States of America today, no matter what brand or manufacturer, bears a
“black box” FDA warning label – the government’s most serious drug warning –
of “increased risks of suicidal thinking and behavior, known as suicidality,
in young adults ages 18 to 24.” Common sense tells us that where there are
suicidal thoughts – especially in a very, very angry person – homicidal
thoughts may not be far behind. Indeed, the mass shooters we are describing
often take their own lives when the police show up, having planned their
suicide ahead of time.
So, what ‘medication’ was Lanza on?
The Sandy Hook school massacre, we are constantly reminded, was the
“second-worst school shooting in U.S. history.” Let’s briefly revisit the
worst, Virginia Tech, because it provides an important lesson for us. One
would think, in light of the stunning correlation between psych meds and
mass murders, that it would be considered critical to establish definitively
whether the Virginia Tech murderer of 32 people, student Cho Seung-Hui, had
been taking psychiatric drugs.
Yet, more than five years later, the answer to that question remains a
mystery.
Even though initially the New York Times reported, “officials said
prescription medications related to the treatment of psychological problems
had been found among Mr. Cho’s effects,” and the killer’s roommate, Joseph
Aust, had told the Richmond Times-Dispatch that Cho’s routine each morning
had included taking prescription drugs, the state’s toxicology report
released two months later said “no prescription drugs or toxic substances
were found in Cho Seung-Hui.”
Perhaps so, but one of the most notoriously unstable and unpredictable times
for users of SSRI antidepressants is the period shortly after they’ve
stopped taking them, during which time the substance may not be detectable
in the body.
What kind of meds might Cho have been taking – or recently have stopped
taking? Curiously, despite an exhaustive investigation by the Commonwealth
of Virginia which disclosed that Cho had taken Paxil for a year in 1999,
specifics on what meds he was taking prior to the Virginia Tech massacre
have remained elusive. The final 20,000-word report manages to omit any
conclusive information about the all-important issue of Cho’s medications
during the period of the mass shooting.
To add to the drama, it wasn’t until two years after the state’s in-depth
report was issued that, as disclosed in an Aug. 19, 2009, ABC News report,
some of Cho’s long-missing mental health records were located:
The records released today were discovered to be missing during a Virginia
panel’s August 2007 investigation four-and-a-half months after the massacre.
The notes were recovered last month from the home of Dr. Robert Miller, the
former director of the counseling center, who says he inadvertently packed
Cho’s file into boxes of personal belongings when he left the center in
February 2006. Until the July 2009 discovery of the documents, Miller said
he had no idea he had the records.
Miller has since been let go from the university.
Although Cho’s newly discovered mental-health files reportedly revealed
nothing further about his medications, the issues raised by the initial
accounts – including the “officials” cited by the New York Times and the
Richmond paper’s eyewitness account of daily meds-taking – remain
unaddressed to this day.
Some critics suggest these official omissions are motivated by a desire to
protect the drug companies from ruinous product liability claims. Indeed,
pharmaceutical manufacturers are nervous about lawsuits over the “rare
adverse effects” of their mood-altering medications. To avoid costly
settlements and public relations catastrophes – such as when GlaxoSmithKline
was ordered to pay $6.4 million to the family of 60-year-old Donald Schnell
who murdered his wife, daughter and granddaughter in a fit of rage shortly
after starting on Paxil – drug companies’ legal teams have quietly and
skillfully settled hundreds of cases out-of-court, shelling out hundreds of
millions of dollars to plaintiffs. Pharmaceutical giant Eli Lilly fought
scores of legal claims against Prozac in this way, settling for cash before
the complaint could go to court while stipulating that the settlement remain
secret – and then claiming it had never lost a Prozac lawsuit.
All of which is, once again, to respectfully but urgently ask the question:
When on earth are we going to find out if the perpetrator of the Sandy Hook
school massacre, like so many other mass shooters, had been taking
psychiatric drugs?
In the end, it may well turn out that knowing what kinds of guns he used isn’t
nearly as important as what kind of drugs he used.
That is, assuming we ever find out.
Read more at
http://www.wnd.com/2013/01/the-giant-gaping-hole-in-sandy-hook-reporting/#yBkV3RdEXfJG5gT1.99
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.2805 / Virus Database: 2637/6017 - Release Date: 01/07/13
__._,_.___
FREEDOM FIGHTERS FOR AMERICA
www.freedomfightersforamerica.com
FREEDOM FIGHTERS FOR AMERICA WORLD RADIO
http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=27564&cmd=tc
EMAIL GROUP
(THIS IS E-MAIL ONLY, NOT FULL MEMBERSHIP)
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/freedomfightersforamerica/
Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully
Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___
--
This is a Free Speech forum. The owner of this list assumes no responsibility
for the intellectual or emotional maturity of its members. If you do not like
what is being said here, filter it to trash, ignore it or leave. If you leave,
learn how to do this for yourself. If you do not, you will be here forever.
