Hi Jawad, In case it can help, there is a MR-US registration tool in 3D Slicer (you will need to install SlicerProstate extension, and please post questions on Slicer forum if further help needed). It is described and evaluated in these papers (the second validation paper was based on an independent dataset and performed by a group independent from the original developers):
Fedorov, A., Khallaghi, S., Sánchez, C. A., Lasso, A., Fels, S., Tuncali, K., Sugar, E. N., Kapur, T., Zhang, C., Wells, W., Nguyen, P. L., Abolmaesumi, P. & Tempany, C. Open-source image registration for MRI-TRUS fusion-guided prostate interventions. Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg. 10, 925–934 (2015). Poulin, E., Boudam, K., Pinter, C., Kadoury, S., Lasso, A., Fichtinger, G. & Ménard, C. Validation of MRI to TRUS registration for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy. Brachytherapy (2018). doi:10.1016/j.brachy.2017.11.018 Like everything else in 3D Slicer, this tools is open source with no strings attached, and migration it into MITK should definitely be doable, if someone is interested and has resources to do this. @MITK developers: by no means this is to suggest users should switch to 3D Slicer from MITK. There is a lot of synergy between the Slicer and MITK communities, and I really just want to help by mutually increasing awareness about the capabilities of these two tools between the two communities, which (unfortunately!) do not talk often enough, in my opinion. I hope this is helpful! AF On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 4:42 PM Floca, Ralf Omar <r.fl...@dkfz-heidelberg.de> wrote: > > Dear Jawad, > > regarding your questions: > - Elastography: As far as I know we have no modules/plugins so far for > elastographic analysis. But contributions are very welcome ;). > > - Registration of US: We have no dedicated algorithms so far for US > registration onto other modalities. Do you have a 2D-3D or a 3D-3D problem > statement? But it is not impossible that one of our build in configurations > or the wrapped registration toolboxes (e.g. plastimatch) have a configuration > that fits your needs. > > Best regards, > Ralf > ________________________________________ > Von: Jawad DAHMANI <jawad.dahm...@gmail.com> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 14. März 2019 16:29 > An: mitk-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Betreff: [mitk-users] Elastography with MITK > > Hi, > I'm a Phd student working on deformations on ultrasound images and > elastography. > I would like to know whether MITK have some options for quasi-static > elastography and ultrasound non-rigid registration ? > Thanks for your help > > Best regards > > > _______________________________________________ > mitk-users mailing list > mitk-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mitk-users _______________________________________________ mitk-users mailing list mitk-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mitk-users
