> (bad) partial deinterlace. The output looks jerky and it doesn't save
> any bits either.
Hmmmm, I haven't noticed the jerkiness. Seemed to save some bits
but perhaps not as many as it could.
I never noticed before, but on a high-motion scene played back on the
TV the slow-motion effect was very prominent.
And what I meant to say was, not using -I for interlaced inputs
doesn't save (m)any bits versus using -I. In all my tests
yuvmedianfilter (used correctly or not) saves a lot more bits than
yuvdenoise. Direct comparison shows why - yuvmedianfilter really
softens the picture a lot. Median filtering in general is great for
noise distributions with long tails (non-gaussian, impulsive noise)
since it can exclude large outliers rather than averaging them in like
linear filtering, but the flip-side seems to be that edge detail gets
obliterated. There are lots of different median-filtering schemes out
there that are probably better than this simple one, but it's not
really my area.
Dan
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
_______________________________________________
Mjpeg-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
