On Sun, 17 Aug 2003, Maik Holtkamp wrote:

Hi!

> >             Use a single file.
> 
> Yes, I will do so.

        That will work much better ;)

> dvdauthor -a.. -v.. 1.mpg 2.mpg ... <last>.mpg
> 
> and as I understand the readme of dvdauthor I am in one titleset,
> when using this command:

        True - BUT (and this is a part I left out):  dvdauthor inserts
        a "gap" (to avoid overlapping clock/timer values in the streams).
        That, I believe, is what is causing the freeze/pause/stutter
        which folks see.   Yes, it is all in one titleset but there is
        a discontinuity created at the file change points.

> As I understand both calls (-c <times> big or 1 2 3) should create
> the same result: One titleset/track with chapters. 

        The case using multiple files will have 'breaks' at the file
        change times.   Some players (and most/all software players)
        handle these points better than other players but there is often
        a visible glitch.

> >     Are you creating DVDs with multiple angles in the video stream?
> 
> No. I just read the new manpage and thought -c is probably a good
> idea. I will skip in future, THX.

        I had the same thought, tried it and discovered a bug in mpeg2enc
        (which was fixed soon after the report).   Even after the bug was
        fixed I decided that the (slight) increase in filesize was not
        desireable and I removed the -c from the scripts.

> As I understand this:
> 
> The more I go down with -q the more close I go to constant bitrate
> meeting my -b setting, right?

        100% correct.   At a certain poing the encoder effectively becomes
        CBR and then varies the quality to maintain the specified bitrate.

> It uses transcode ...-w 3800 ... -N 0x50, -F 5 but I want 5.1 sound
> and thought the bitrate is rather low. My test orginal (pulp fiction
> PAL) was at 8800/1100 and the files I extracted had about 4.9 GB.
> 
> So there was no need for a drastical reduction to 3800.

        3800 is far too low for full frame.  It is a good value for
        352x576 (PAL) or 352x480 (NTSC) - the 1/2 size (which is a valid
        DVD resolution).

> Moreover I thought it is a better idea to start at -F 8. I konw it is
> probably possible to extend the xsvcd profile to suit dvd needs, but

        A better approach to fitting as much as possible on a single DVD
        is to use the 1/2 resolution.  For casual viewing the 352xN size
        works very well and can more than double the amount of playtime
        compared to the 720xN size.

> ..now, I understand that the prozess is hardly automatable :(. I hope
> my guessing of good values for -q and -b will increase in line with
> experiance.

        Yes - experience is a very good teacher ;)   After a bit of
        practice you will have a good idea how to select the appropriate
        values based on the quality of the sources and the desired output
        size.

        Cheers,
        Steven Schultz



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01
_______________________________________________
Mjpeg-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users

Reply via email to