On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 07:02:54PM -0700, Steven M. Schultz wrote: > > > The -N parameter does work quite well for shrinking a file, but > > it seems it's a bit sensitive. In a test run, with -N 0.0 I got > > a file size of 748,032 kbyte. With -N of 0.1 I got 708,956 kbyte > > on the same input. The 40meg loss did drop it right into my > > target size window, so it worked for that, but I was expecting > > less drop from > > 39076/748032 > .0522 > > 39,076KB sounds like a lot but it's only 5%
0.1/2.0 = .005 Yes, only 5%, but it's a 5% file size change, with only a 0.5% change to the value of -N. Or in other words, the -N value looks to possibly have a 10x effect on resultant file size. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Mjpeg-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
