On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, Richard Ellis wrote:
>
> If you'd still like a piece of the capture, I'll gladly push some
> stuff your way. But, in further experimenting tonight I think I've
sure - go ahead and push it to the location I mentioned.
> found the culprit. If I drop the -Q 4.0 parameter, then rc92 stops
> producing the splotches. It looks like rc92 has a different effect
Ah ha - but it's puzzling that it didn't happen for me (I feel
deprived ;)). Must have a data dependency element.
4.0 is a high setting - perhaps you could try 1.0 - and when I
inquired about -Q there was mention of possible artifacting.
> (and a bad one at that) with the -Q parameter than what rc90 had with
> the -Q parameter.
Does it do that on _all_ encodings? From what you mention it was
not constant thru out a movie but came and went - that sounds like
a data dependent triggered problem (could be a bug too ;))
Cheers,
Steven Schultz
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
_______________________________________________
Mjpeg-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
