On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Al Bogner wrote:
> What do you think makes a better encoding from excellent sources: the
> kvcd or tmpgenc matrix if the result should have the _same_ filesize.
tmpgenc of course. the kvcd tables were designed to reduce the bitrate
to allow for longer playing time - once detail/contrast/sharpness is
lost it can not be recovered by raising the bitrate.
> With kvcd you can use higher bitrates. I have to encode a movie with
Yes, and defeat the purpose of using the kvcd tables in the first
place ;) Depending on the material you can see the effect of the
kvcd tables - slight softening or less sharpness at times.
> more than 2 hrs at a bitrate between 4000-4500kbps.
For clean material I'd start with "-q 6 -K tmpgenc -E -10" - that's
been a good combination of parameters for me.
Cheers,
Steven Schultz
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms.
Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html
_______________________________________________
Mjpeg-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
