On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 07:44:33PM +0200, Torsten Mohr wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> thanks for that hint.
> 
> It looks like this project is not yet really stable,
> has anybody got some experiences with this?

If you mean the pvr250/350 driver, it seems very stable.  I've been
running one in a second box now since March 27.  The box itself has
not been rebooted since March 31 (21 days uptime).  In that time it's
recorded quite a lot of video, including one weekend early on where I
was "stress testing" it by recording 5 minute segments with 2 minute
waits in between on a loop of about 10 different channels for the
whole weekend.  Absolutely no problems so far that I have been able
to detect.  I am running the 0.1.9 version of the drivers because at
the time, the 0.1.10pre1 didn't seem to work for me.  I've not tried
the 10pre2 release.

There's at least one other person on the list who's also running one,
because he tipped me off to the fact that the drivers were more
stable than they appear from the web page.

> > However, you omitted option #3:
> >
> > Get a Hauppage WinTV-PVR250/PVR350 card, and you not only have an
> > on-board tuner, but hardware compression straight to MPEG all on
> > one little PCI card (linux drivers at
> > http://ivtv.sourceforge.net/).



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Robotic Monkeys at ThinkGeek
For a limited time only, get FREE Ground shipping on all orders of $35
or more. Hurry up and shop folks, this offer expires April 30th!
http://www.thinkgeek.com/freeshipping/?cpg=12297
_______________________________________________
Mjpeg-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users

Reply via email to