On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 09:36:05 -0800 (PST)
"Steven M. Schultz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>       The latest version of libquicktime is 0.9.4 and it is necessary to
>       use the cvs version of mjpegtools if you want quicktime support.  You
>       could try configuring mjpegtools using "--without-libquicktime" but
>       a lot of fixes and improvements have been made in mjpegtools since
>       1.6.2 so getting the cvs version is a good idea.
> 
>       Cheers,
>       Steven Schultz
> 
> 

Hi Steven,

took your advice and cvs'ed the files. But running autoconf259 produces errors 
and the configure script produced doesn't run either (no wonder I think).

These are the errors:
# autoconf259
configure.ac:18: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE
           If this token and others are legetimate, please use m4_pattern_allow
     [no idea what that means - I never used autoconf before ,-{  ]
configure.ac:19: error: possibly undefined macro:AM_MAINTAINER_MODE
configure.ac:70: error: possibly undefined macro:AC_PROC_LIBTOOL
configure.ac:75: error: possibly undefined macro:AM_PROC_CC_STDC
configure.ac:85: error: possibly undefined macro:AM_PROC_AS
configure.ac:105: error: possibly undefined macro:AC_DEFINE
configure.ac:162: error: possibly undefined macro:AM_CONDITIONAL
configure.ac:301: error: possibly undefined macro:AM_PATH_GTK
configure.ac:311: error: possibly undefined macro:AM_PATH_SDL
#


I'd like to use mjpegtools, but I stumble from one obstacle into another

CVS-version of mjpegtools was 1.7.0.

Cheers,
Sebastian





-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
_______________________________________________
Mjpeg-users mailing list
Mjpeg-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users

Reply via email to