Steven M. Schultz schrieb: > I do NOT think it's a good idea. Upscaling ~20-30% (depending if you're > >in a NTSC or PAL area) degrades the quality so much I couldn't watch >it (yes - I've done it and didn't like the results ;)). > > > Well, I think this heavily depends on the used scaler (and on the one watching the result :)... I know an upscaling method which is (extremely!) slow but yields to really good (my opinion -- at least) results for 2x upscaling... It is not noticable most of the time. I have invented that because I thought I would need it for the deinterlacer (but I do not...)... it does not fit a LP-Surface (cubic or sinc or...) to the data but image-structures, so it really adds resolution which is belivable (but not neccesarily realy...)...
If downscaled to an effective upscaling of 50% it gives a nice antialias-effect, too :) Not sure if I will release that... Stefan -- Gnomemeeting/Netmeeting: callto:ils.seconix.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 131490319 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click _______________________________________________ Mjpeg-users mailing list Mjpeg-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
