On Wednesday 03 May 2006 06:53, Stephen Mollett wrote: > Hi, > > On Wednesday 03 May 2006 05:28, Bob Stia wrote: > > Recently ripped and shrank a DVD and rebuilt it with mplex. Final size > > was 4.5GB. growisofs then complained it would not fit on the DVD+R as it > > had too many "blocks". > > ... > > Soooo....Is the reality that I have to shoot for under 4.38GB or 4.7GB?? > > The 4.38GB figure is more accurate. Here are a few reported capacities from > different media I have to hand: > > DVD-R: 2,297,888 sectors = 4,706,074,624B, 4,488MB, 4.38GB > DVD+R, DVD+RW: 2,295,104 sectors = 4,700,372,992B, 4,482MB, 4.38GB > DVD+R/DL: 4,173,824 sectors = 8,547,991,552B, 8,152MB, 7.96GB > DVD-RAM: 2,236,704 sectors = 4,580,769,792B, 4,368MB, 4.26GB > > I don't have any DVD-RW or DVD-R/DL media. > > These figures seem to be consistent across different manufacturers > (Verbatim, Datawrite, Ricoh) so I suspect they're standardised; overburning > doesn't seem to work - my drives simply stop writing and return an error > when they reach the rated capacity of the disc. > > You can get these figures from the dvd+rw-mediainfo command; look for "Free > blocks" on a blank disc. Discs that have been written will give different > values; a "Read capacity" value will be shown that corresponds to the size > of the data on the disc. > > Hope this helps (I'll keep a copy of this to hand for my own reference!) > Thanks guys for replying. Appreciated. Guess I will have to keep everything under 4.38GB
Bob S. ------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Mjpeg-users mailing list Mjpeg-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
