On Wed, 5 Jul 2006, stefan wrote:
> clearly depends on what he tries to do... I (at least) prefer good
> deinterlaced material to interlaced material as I can not tell the
It's your (and his) video.
NOTE: reversing a 2:2 or 2:3 pulldown IS NOT deinterlacing. Un-doing
a film->video pulldown is LOSSLESS when correctly done.
Deinterlacing is, as you might guess, not lossless.
> BTW I do record progressive only, now... *g*
Silly to record progressive if the source is interlaced. Or is
broadcast TV in Germany progressive?
> but clearly, I suppose, he does use an old version... There should not
> be any greenscreen in current yuvdeinterlace. Can I please get an URL to
I think part of the problem is that '-s' was being accepted as valid
even though it is ignored (does nothing). I have removed and checked
in the change to completely remove -s.
-g is, from what I can see, still a valid option.
True, there should not be any green screen (which is a symptom of
0 filled buffers since Y'CbCr of 0/0/0 is a bright green).
I wouldn't know if there is a problem or not since I leave interlaced
material interlaced at encoding time ;)
Deinterlacing can be done at playback time if needed. So for TV
displays you have the original interlaced video, but for computer
display you can choose how to deinterlace ('xine' I believe has
a choice of methods to use when deinterlacing at playback time).
Cheers,
Steven Schultz
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Mjpeg-users mailing list
Mjpeg-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
