for a conservative approach - yes. Though I think adding resolution 17
to the overview map, would be quite good (don't know if for Asia or
Europe continent maps however, the overview map would become too big and
fail to compile).
On 06.05.2013 13:53, GerdP wrote:
> Hi Felix,
> so you suggest this?
>
> levels = 0:24, 1:22, 2:20, 3:18
> overview-levels = 4:16, 5:14
>
> Gerd
BTW - I have a problem with the overview branch - and my style (didn't
try default one yet):
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.build.LocatorUtil.getNameTags(Luk/me/parabola/util/EnhancedProperties;)Ljava/util/List;
at
uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.reader.osm.LinkDestinationHook.init(LinkDestinationHook.java:64)
at
uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.reader.osm.OsmMapDataSource.pluginChain(OsmMapDataSource.java:182)
at
uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.reader.osm.OsmMapDataSource.setupHandler(OsmMapDataSource.java:150)
at
uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.reader.osm.bin.OsmBinMapDataSource.load(OsmBinMapDataSource.java:49)
at
uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.reader.osm.OsmMapDataSource.load(OsmMapDataSource.java:124)
at
uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.MapMaker.loadFromFile(MapMaker.java:155)
at uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.MapMaker.makeMap(MapMaker.java:57)
at uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.Main$1.call(Main.java:234)
at uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.Main$1.call(Main.java:231)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(Unknown Source)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(Unknown Source)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(Unknown
Source)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(Unknown
Source)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.build.LocatorUtil.getNameTags(Luk/me/parabola/util/EnhancedProperties;)Ljava/util/List;
at uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.build.Locator.<init>(Locator.java:51)
at uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.build.Locator.<init>(Locator.java:47)
at
uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.build.MapBuilder.<init>(MapBuilder.java:146)
at
uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.combiners.OverviewBuilder.writeOverviewMap(OverviewBuilder.java:91)
at
uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.combiners.OverviewBuilder.onFinish(OverviewBuilder.java:84)
at uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.Main.endOptions(Main.java:536)
at
uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.CommandArgsReader.readArgs(CommandArgsReader.java:128)
at uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.Main.main(Main.java:119)
>
> Felix Hartmann-2 wrote
>> oh, and I would suppose a "," comma is missing too!
>> On 06.05.2013 13:46, GerdP wrote:
>>> Hi Felix,
>>>
>>> yes, it was a typo. I tested with different values. I have no preference
>>> and
>>> no experience,
>>> so I'd be happy to hear proposals.
>>>
>>> Gerd
>>>
>>>
>>> Felix Hartmann-2 wrote
>>>> Is there a typo in the options file?
>>>> "overview-levels = 5:16 6:18"
>>>>
>>>> shouldn't that be 5:16 6:14 ???
>>>> I think that if the numbering continues, further levels should be
>>>> decreasing resolution. So if 18 and 16 should be used in the overview
>>>> map (but why have 17 then as normal map resolution??):
>>>> it should read "5:18 6:16" -- However I thought overlapping resolutions
>>>> is not good form (actually dunno what happens).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> IMHO 5:16 6:14 is quite good as conservative value. (continent maps).
>>>> Maybe we should even move to 4:17 5:16 6:14 in the overview map (and 0-3
>>>> in the normal map)...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> As for the routable basemap on newer garmin GPS. Maybe we could create a
>>>> non routable mkgmap created basemap and recommend people to use it
>>>> instead?
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>>>> mkgmap-dev@.org
>>>> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> View this message in context:
>>> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Overview2-branch-options-file-typo-tp5759855p5759856.html
>>> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>>>
>> mkgmap-dev@.org
>>> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>> mkgmap-dev@.org
>> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Overview2-branch-options-file-typo-tp5759855p5759858.html
> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
