Hi Gerd
> just to make sure: > your style creates two lines for one OSM way, they have different > types, but both below 0x3f, Well, it doesnt happen if 0x02 is replaced by 0x31. I think it only happens with "standard" routable line types (0x01-0x13, 0x16, 0x1a,0x1b) but i havent tested them all > and one has road speed/class , the other has not. > Which one come first? The ones with routing parameters come first. After this I handle the cycle routes with line 0x02 to make sure they are always rendered on top (on all GPS devices). I always needed to put on 0x02 routing parameters too because of this issue. I thought I might give it a try to remove them, but it seems the issue is still the case. > I think when it causes problems, we should try to find a better > solution or print a warning. A warning would be fine, in case multiple routable lines are detected. If that's too complicated, I would suggest to print the old warning only with --check-styles: "Non-routable way with routable type 0x.. starting at ... is used for a routable map. This can lead to routing errors if multiple routable lines on this way are used." _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
