Hi Minko what about 0xa ? Or was that meant to be 0x1a ? Gerd
> Date: Sun, 11 May 2014 11:22:33 +0200 > From: ligfiet...@online.nl > To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk > Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Commit: r3259: remove most checks regarding > routable/non-routable types. > > > > that sounds like the original list was not so bad: > > //return type >= 0x01 && type <= 0x13 || type == 0x1a || type == 0x1b > > || type == 0x16; > > what about 0x16, 0x1a and 0x1b ? > > > > 0xa is in the range 0x01 - 0x13. Is this really an exception? And is > > it the only one? > > Hi Gerd > > 0x16: routing error > 0x1a: no routing error (double checked this) > 0x1b: routing error > > So it's weird that only 0x1a shows no routing error. > Better keep the original list then to be safe? > > > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
