Hi Andrzej, if you want to try this: you can easily change the code in interpolatedHeight to return the height in feet, just make sure that you don't convert UNDEF.
The only other change that is needed is in this line in DemHeader: writer.putInt(0); // 0: elevation in metres, 1: foot well, the comment should say feet , not foot Gerd ________________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Frank Stinner <frank.stin...@kabelmail.de> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. Januar 2018 17:27:22 An: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] HGT - getElevation() Hi Gerd and Andrzej, i think "overkill" is a good word. For algorithm that'a only numbers, it does not matter. The questions is, how exact are the hgt-values. We don't know that, but i don't believe it is +-1m or so. I'm not wondering, when the hgt's have +-5m or +-10m. The copernicus-data have +-7m and i don't believe the technic was worse. That's why feets are overkill. The numbers are 3 times greater, that's why the dem's are greater. It's not worth it. Frank --- Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren geprüft. https://www.avast.com/antivirus _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
