Hi Andrzej, okay, got it. You are right, one should test the encoded values. OSM data might as well be shifted due to wrong sat images. I'm still coding the unit tests, next I'll look again at the different versions of the patch.
ciao, Gerd ________________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Andrzej Popowski <po...@poczta.onet.pl> Gesendet: Montag, 15. Januar 2018 23:33:03 An: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] HGT - getElevation() Hi Gerd, I use SRTM3 v3, so map can be different, but I'm surprised by difference in details. That's why I wanted to recompile map. I can see shift in shading when aligning DEM, I told so in my first post. But I rather don't notice that shading doesn't fit map features. Probably this becomes visible, when comparing 2 versions. Judging shadings can be a bit subjective. I have tried to verify actual height displayed under cursor versus HGT data and this looked good. -- Best regards, Andrzej _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
