On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 10:38 PM, Carl Karsten <[email protected]> wrote:
> This example shows something weird.   in/out is in frames, but I think
> it is getting converted to time, and then converted back to frames,

nah

> and a different fps used for the 2 conversions.  I haven't done the
> math yet, and my ntsc math is questionable anyway.
>
> Also not sure how the auto_profile thing you mentioned will effect
> this. It may hide it, but I don't think it will fix it. or something.
>
> melt -profile dv_ntsc -producer color:red out=1300 meta.attr.titles=1
> meta.attr.titles.markup=#timecode# -attach data_show dynamic=1
> -progress -consumer avformat:bar.dv pix_fmt=yuv411p

There was a bug in the frame number to timecode converter with
non-integral frame rates. I just committed a fix. I also committed a
change to add support for #frame#

> melt -profile dv_ntsc bar.dv in=1000 out=1000
> # I see 00:00:34:14

Using #frame# this now shows 1000.

> melt bar.dv in=1000 out=1000
> # I see 00:00:41:10

And this obviously does not show 1000 but rather 1199.

Thanks for helping to locate a bug here. Good thing that timecode
converter was not used for anything critical with MLT's timing.
Instead, it was only used for this timecode burn-in filter.
-- 
+-DRD-+

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1,  ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3.
Spend less time writing and  rewriting code and more time creating great
experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb
_______________________________________________
Mlt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mlt-devel

Reply via email to