Philip,

I do agree with you to a certain extent.

Companies do support Windows more then Linux. Windows users will be used to Windows and will want Linux to act like Windows, when we all know it shouldn't - that part is true.

However, anybody saying that Linux is easier, as easy, or almost as easy as Windows is GREATLY mistaken. Geeks tend to forget they're geeks and think "If I can do it, Joe Doe can too" - that certainly is not the case.

If there are 100 distributions out there, only two are easy to use. Mandrake and Fedora. These two, however, are definately not as easy to use as Windows. How would you explain to a Windows user that using Fedora's up2date manager can actually send you to RPM hell? How would you explain to a Windows user that Mandrake places some Linux files in non-standard places, so what you read on the web doesn't apply to your system? How would you explain to a windows user that even on the easiest Linux distro out there, you still have to use a terminal to install anything?

How would you explain to a Windows user "Hey, I've installed OpenOffice for you. If you want to upgrade, simply download the tarball, use tar xvzf (in the terminal of course [oh, dont forget to login as root] and un-extract the files, and run the setup. Oh, then logout from root and run your user setup. Oh, the icons won't come in the kde menu automatically, so you'll have to add them yourself........... etc... etc... ad nauseum"?

I could give, literally hundreds of ways in which Linux lacks behind in usability. I'm a Linux advocate, I love Linux, hate Microsoft and all the other stuff.. But I am awake enough to smell the coffee - Linux usability sucks.

As for running Windows applications, well, I won't comment on that as I've never had to do it myself since I own a copy of Windows just for those 1 or 2 programs anyway.

Keith

P.S: This was not a flame


Philip Serrracino Inglott wrote:

Dear Angelo,

This posting sounds a bit like a flame bait.

It is well known that MS benchmark Linux. The two systems do influence
each other in many ways.
Just think of the look and feel of KDE and the fact that ASP supporst
Perl-like regexps.

As to how obvious the obvious is: you mention ease of installation,
presumebly you mean ease of installation
on an avarage PC bought recently with a plain vanilla configuration and
periferals. I wonder what the results
would be like if you compared installing on cd-rom less or screen less
workstations.

What i'm tring to say is that the word "Wins" does not make much sense
when comparing different categories.
If you race a Landrover against a ferrari the ferrari wins! ( as long as
you are not racing up selmun hill)

Hmmm I wonder what my girl friend would think if she knew you called her
a geek :-P she uses
gnome without any hassle! and the version of linux you are looking for
is probabbly a
KDE setup. It will not run windows applications of course (excluding the
use of WINE)
but then agin I'd like a version of windows with that extra feature
called "no cost" too.

Thanks for the feedback anyway

Philip


Angelo Dalli wrote:

Hi guys,

just had an interesting chat with some people working for Microsoft Research... (whom I shall not name)

And surprise, surprise -- they actually do benchmark Windows against Linux :-) In fact they have a "Linux Advisory Group" within MS :-)

Their results just confirm the obvious: in certain areas, like storage handling and uptime reliability, Linux wins. On usability and ease of installation, Windows wins.

I would love to have a version of Linux that can support Windows applications seamlessly and that can allow normal users to actually *use it* without all the hassle involved, but I think that for now Linux will remain a server and/or geek oriented OS.

Cheers,

Angelo Dalli



______________ ______________ ______________ ______________
Sent via the WebMail system at maltalinks.com



                  ---
[This E-mail was scanned for spam and viruses by NextGen.net.]

_______________________________________________
MLUG-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailserv.megabyte.net/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list




_______________________________________________
MLUG-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailserv.megabyte.net/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list



--
Keith Vassallo
Registered GNU/Linux User #290991
http://www.keithvassallo.net

Reply via email to