Malta Linux User Group - general list" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [LINUX.ORG.MT] 10.04 upgrade
Date: Sat, 01 May 2010 09:23:26 +0100
X-Mailer: IlohaMail/0.8.14 (On: webmail.onvol.net)
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
In-Reply-To: <1272711335.7986.5.ca...@localhost>
From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Bounce-To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Errors-To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0 
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi All!!!

Thanks for the advice! I won't!

Joseph

On 1/5/2010, "Andrew Cilia" <[email protected]> wrote:

>Hi Joseph,
>    I can't say that I got much out of the upgrade. So, at this point in
>your thesis, why bother?=20
>
>If it ain't broke,  don't fix it.=20
>
>
>On Sat, 2010-05-01 at 02:55 +0100, [email protected] wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>=20
>> I'm writing my thesis, using Sun's OpenOffice 3.2. I had to remove the
>> default OO 3.1 in 9.04 as it had bug which wasn't allowing me to add
>> notes to documents. I followed the instructions in
>> http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=3D1404156 to install... install
>> is OK and I have the functionality I need...
>>=20
>> Did anyone find any problems upgrading in this scenario? I can't risk
>> losing lots of work and time finding out that OOO.3.2 is broken after I
>> upgrade to 10.04
>>=20
>> Cheers
>>=20
>> Joseph
>>=20
>> On 30/4/2010, "Anton Xuereb" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>=20
>> >The release notes are somewhat bitter sweet, seems like they released a
>> >whole load of bugs..
>> >
>> >http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/releasenotes/1004
>> >
>> >On 04/30/2010 01:59 PM, Andrew Cilia wrote:
>> >> I had no probs in upgrading. VMWARE patched and now fine, VPN's fine,
>> >> gnome fine, evolution still crashing.  All normal. Seeing that nothing
>> >> feels that much different is all the more reason for me to look at the
>> >> release notes and see what I got myself into I suppose.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 02:13 +0200, Anton Xuereb wrote:
>> >>> ok 10.04 first impressions..
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> i want my 9.10 back!
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> now!
>> >>>
>> >>> On 30 April 2010 00:04, Anton Xuereb <[email protected]
>> >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>     upgrade process changes them again...changing them manually worked
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>     On 29 April 2010 23:26, Rodrick Borg <[email protected]
>> >>>     <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>         I dunno if I understood you problem exactly but to change the
>> >>>         download server:
>> >>>
>> >>>         go to Systems -> Administration _> Software Sources
>> >>>
>> >>>         Then change download from to a new mirror... (You can click
>> >>>         Other -> Select Best Server)
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>         On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Anton Xuereb
>> >>>         <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>             Hey guys,
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>             Im trying to do a dist-upgrade to teh latest ubuntu
>> >>>             version, unfortunately the automatic updater
>> >>>             (update-manager) changes the sources.list file to point
>> >>>             to the central ubuntu mirror which as you can guess atm,
>> >>>             is slower than watching paint dry.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>             Is there some way of forcing it to use a different mirror
>> >>>             for the upgrade ? I'd like to be ready at 2am tops.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>             M
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>             _______________________________________________
>> >>>             MLUG-list mailing list
>> >>>             [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> >>>             http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>         _______________________________________________
>> >>>         MLUG-list mailing list
>> >>>         [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> >>>         http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> MLUG-list mailing list
>> >>> [email protected]  <mailto:[email protected]>
>> >>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> The information contained in this email is confidential and may be
>> >> privileged. It is intended for the addressee only, if you are not the
>> >> intended recipient please notify the sender and delete the email
>> >> immediately. The contents of this email must not be disclosed or
>> >> copied without the senders consent.
>> >> We cannot accept any responsibility for viruses.
>> >> Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
>> >> sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the
>> >> view of Philip Toledo Limited
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> MLUG-list mailing list
>> >> [email protected]
>> >> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> MLUG-list mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>
>
>
>
>The information contained in this email is confidential and may be privilege=
d. It is intended for the addressee only, if you are not the intended recipie=
nt please notify the sender and delete the email immediately. The contents of=
 this email must not be disclosed or copied without the senders consent.
>We cannot accept any responsibility for viruses.
>Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, exce=
pt where the sender specifically states them to be the view of Philip Toledo =
Limited
>
>
_______________________________________________
MLUG-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list

Reply via email to