HI Martijn The only invokeDynamic Smalltalk on the jvm which I am aware of is mine (I call it Rtalk for now). There are other Smalltalks on the jvm but they are cross compilers or interpreters.
Rtalk was the subject of a paper at last years JVM Language Symposium mark mlvm-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net wrote on 04/02/2012 11:05:42 PM: > From: Martijn Verburg <martijnverb...@gmail.com> > To: Da Vinci Machine Project <mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net> > Date: 04/02/2012 11:14 PM > Subject: Re: Coroutines in JDK8++? > Sent by: mlvm-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net > > Hi Mark, > On 3 April 2012 00:40, Mark Roos <mr...@roos.com> wrote: > Hi Martijn > > If the effort meets my needs I'll be there to help. My goal is a > full implementation > of Smalltalk on the JVM. One thing I need is the ability to > manipulate a suspended > thread from the object side. For this Lukas' work seems a good fit. > > Sounds good, I know I've heard of a Smalltalk port that is already > in existence, is this your work? > > My concern is that (as John Rose points out) this will open a > security hole that makes > Java folks uncomfortable. As such the final result could be > political not technical, not > a battle I would relish. > > I think that's why we should first get a good OSS project around > this and then have a full discussion as soon > as possible (e.g. When the right people have got some cycles to > think about this properly/deeply). > > Cheers, > Martijn_______________________________________________ > mlvm-dev mailing list > mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
_______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
