I’ve just checked Magik on Java’s implementation and we only use one ClassValue (to connect our method table objects with their corresponding classes) so a reduction in the initial map size would definitely be a good for us.
From: Christian Thalinger <christian.thalin...@oracle.com<mailto:christian.thalin...@oracle.com>> Reply-To: Da Vinci Machine Project <mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net<mailto:mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net>> Date: Tuesday, 7 January 2014 22:54 To: Da Vinci Machine Project <mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net<mailto:mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net>> Subject: RFC: JDK-8031043: ClassValue's backing map should have a smaller initial size Can I get some comments on this bug from people who are using ClassValue? [#JDK-8031043] ClassValue's backing map should have a smaller initial size - Java Bug System<https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8031043> Is my assumption correct that most language runtimes only attach a small number of values (maybe only one) or that it wouldn’t matter if the map would grow as needed? _______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
