On Jan 8, 2014, at 2:26 AM, MacGregor, Duncan (GE Energy Management) <duncan.macgre...@ge.com> wrote:
> I’ve just checked Magik on Java’s implementation and we only use one > ClassValue (to connect our method table objects with their corresponding > classes) so a reduction in the initial map size would definitely be a good > for us. Thanks! > > From: Christian Thalinger > <christian.thalin...@oracle.com<mailto:christian.thalin...@oracle.com>> > Reply-To: Da Vinci Machine Project > <mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net<mailto:mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net>> > Date: Tuesday, 7 January 2014 22:54 > To: Da Vinci Machine Project > <mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net<mailto:mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net>> > Subject: RFC: JDK-8031043: ClassValue's backing map should have a smaller > initial size > > Can I get some comments on this bug from people who are using ClassValue? > > [#JDK-8031043] ClassValue's backing map should have a smaller initial size - > Java Bug System<https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8031043> > > Is my assumption correct that most language runtimes only attach a small > number of values (maybe only one) or that it wouldn’t matter if the map would > grow as needed? > _______________________________________________ > mlvm-dev mailing list > mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev _______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
