*it really On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Francisco Fiuza Jr <[email protected]>wrote:
> I have about 3k cards, and the review rate is about 50 cards a day. > I really sucks when you have a week of backlog. > > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Peter Bienstman < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> On Tuesday 30 June 2009 04:18:40 pm Gwern Branwen wrote: >> > On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 8:34 AM, Ben<[email protected]> wrote: >> > > Now, if I only wanted to review, say, 50 cards every day, then I was >> > > hoping that I could still have 10K cards in my deck. This corresponds >> > > to a 0.5% (=50/10K) "review rate". But Peter has a review rate of >> > > 175/8500 = 2%, which seems pretty high to me. In order to determine >> > > how big my practical mental attic is, it seems useful to know whether >> > > achieveable review rates are more like 2% or 0.2%. >> > >> > FWIW, I'm at 1.8% myself. But I'm a little unclear here; I thought the >> > idea of spaced repetition was that the review rate would decrease over >> > time. So wouldn't the question really be 'how long would it take to >> > hit 0.2%?' and not 'whether'? >> >> I will hit any low number, *provided* you don't add new cards in the >> meantime... >> >> Peter >> >> >> >> > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mnemosyne-proj-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
