On Wednesday 01 July 2009 03:33:23 am Ben wrote: > Are you sure about this? Unscientifically, it seems more plausible to > me that there is some minimum limit on how seldomly you can review > something and still remember it. For instance, for a specific card, > here are two sequences of optimal times between review: > > A: 1mo, 3mo, 6mo, 1yr, 2yr, 3yr, 5yr, 7yr, 10yr ... > B: 1mo, 3mo, 6mo, 1yr, 1yr, 1yr, 1yr, 1yr, 1yr ...
Right now the algorithm does behave like A. Whether that is the best way on a 30y time span, nobody knows, but that's one of the things I hope to find out by collecting stats. I'm in it for the long run :-) Peter --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mnemosyne-proj-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
