On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 8:56 AM, Peter Bienstman <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wednesday 01 October 2008 14:14:11 Gwern Branwen wrote: > >> Mnemosyne is already multi-threading, AFAIC, since it's uploading >> statistics - so why not a third thread which is just 'sleep 5m; save; >> repeat'? > > That's not so easy as it sound, as you should make sure not to interfere with > the regular review process. I'd also rather not put any more development into > the 1.x series. > > Peter
I remembered this feature request because I left for a graduation and had a large backlog when I got back; 350 or so reviews in, I paused for a break to do some cleanup and while vacuuming tripped the circuit breaker. Oops. Oh well. What's 350 reviews between friends? I'd point out that the need is still there, and 2.x is still not out. Even a timeout as generous as 100 reviews would have helped. -- gwern -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mnemosyne-proj-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en.
