Mnemosyne 2 is looking quite nice. There are a few things that I preferred in Mnemosyne 1 that I probably just have to get used to, but one thing does seem like a clear step backward.
Many of my cards have a question consisting of a medium-sized image (242x242 pixels) followed by some text. Mnemosyne 1 displayed them fine, but Mnemosyne 2 only provides enough space to see the top half or so of the image; I have to scroll down to see the rest of the image and the following text. I can manually increase the window size so that the entire question is displayed, but then the answer window is expanded by the same amount, which looks silly (typically the answer for these cards is very short). I much preferred Mnemosyne 1 window sizing behavior in both these respects. Dan On Aug 27, 11:29 am, Peter Bienstman <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Beta 4: > > http://users.ugent.be/~pbienst/pub/mnemosyne-beta-4-setup.exe > > -when detecting missing media, only warn once, and give all the affected cards > a 'MISSING_MEDIA' tag, so that you can find them back later. > (from a bug report by Dandelo) > -dialogs now have max/min button under windows > -the main dialogs not only save their size, but also their position > -allow importing of overlay answer cards which are not maps > -attempt to make closing of progress bar after import more robust > -also write error messages to the console > > It might seem that development is happening quicker now, but that's just an > illusion. Difference with the last three years is that now finally we reach a > state where other people can use the software, so it makes sense to push out > these updates quicker now. > > Enjoy! > > Peher -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mnemosyne-proj-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en.
