Actually, I was talking about memorising new cards, not learning ahead of 
schedule of already memorised cards.

But you've helped prove my point that this setting is very confusing :-)

Peter

On Thursday, May 10, 2012 04:53:31 PM Michael Campbell wrote:

In general I agree.  In specifics, ... I think your proposal is fine.  If 
you're 
learning ahead of time you're "going off the reservation" and subverting the 
point of the algorithm, so you don't get to have all your comfortable notions 
about how things should work.  


It's like I read physicists talking about black holes; "the laws of physics as 
we know them break down inside one".  Same deal here; you're going into 
uncharted territory, expect some bumps.  ;-)


(My opinion only, of course; many reasonable people disagree.)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"mnemosyne-proj-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en.

Reply via email to