Oh, Peter, I *EXCEL* at misunderstanding a point. If you ever need anyone to misread or get a point confused, come to me first. =)
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 2:25 AM, Peter Bienstman <[email protected]>wrote: > ** > > Actually, I was talking about memorising new cards, not learning ahead of > schedule of already memorised cards. > > > > But you've helped prove my point that this setting is very confusing :-) > > > > Peter > > > > On Thursday, May 10, 2012 04:53:31 PM Michael Campbell wrote: > > In general I agree. In specifics, ... I think your proposal is fine. If > you're learning ahead of time you're "going off the reservation" and > subverting the point of the algorithm, so you don't get to have all your > comfortable notions about how things should work. > > > It's like I read physicists talking about black holes; "the laws of > physics as we know them break down inside one". Same deal here; you're > going into uncharted territory, expect some bumps. ;-) > > > (My opinion only, of course; many reasonable people disagree.) > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "mnemosyne-proj-users" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > . > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mnemosyne-proj-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en.
