On 01/10/13 01:40, Mike Hommey wrote: > While their license (Apache License 2.0) allow binary redistribution > without the corresponding source (although there is a source jar for > commons-net), shouldn't Mozilla redistribute the sources as well?
I don't think we have an explicit written policy about this. My inclination would be to say that we should have the source code of software we are building in repos under our control, but I'm fairly sure that's not actually true for large chunks of B2G, which are pulled in from 3rd party repos at build time... Gerv _______________________________________________ mobile-firefox-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mobile-firefox-dev
