Hello again.

I've uploaded a (hopefully) near final revision of the patch to the bug [1]
and am requesting feedback from a wider audience on it! Please feel free to
give drive-by feedback; provided there's no major pushback, I'll be waiting
about a week before requesting the final review.

For further details on the state of the patch, I explained it in the bug at
[1].

Thanks!
- Mike (:mcomella)

[1]: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=910859#c45


On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Michael Comella <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hello, everyone.
>
> I took this effort over from Lucas a short while ago and recently uploaded
> my latest revisions to his initial patch [1]. If you'd like to contribute
> feedback, please do so!
>
> Thanks!
> - Mike (:mcomella)
>
> [1]: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=910859#c18
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 2:47 AM, Lucas Rocha <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> > If you ever worked on tests based on our robocop harness, you probably
>> > noticed how unpleasant it is to work on them. Our current UI testing
>> code
>> > suffers from two major problems:
>> >
>> > - Inconsistency/verbosity: The tests and their underlying API are very
>> > ad-hoc. We're duplicating a lot of code, the code is very verbose, and
>> the
>> > current structure with BaseTest subclasses doesn't scale well and almost
>> > inevitably leads to bloated classes with tons of unrelated APIs.
>> > - Unreliability: The tests themselves are unreliable in many ways. Each
>> test
>> > pokes the UI in a different way to check the same things.
>>
>> I deeply care about keeping a nice and positive atmosphere in the our
>> community. The bit above sounds overly negative and critical. I realize
>> that many people have put energy into the current UI testing code and it's
>> definitely not my intention to diminish anyone's contributions.
>>
>> I don't want to set such a bad precedent in our community. So, my
>> apologies for the negative tone here.
>>
>> I'll do it better next time. Promise :-)
>>
>> --lucasr
>> _______________________________________________
>> mobile-firefox-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mobile-firefox-dev
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
mobile-firefox-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mobile-firefox-dev

Reply via email to