On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Adam Baso <ab...@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> I think it was Joaquin, Sam, and Bryan with whom I discussed relative > skins usage on some popular skins, in the context of which skins Reading is > on the hook for in the sense of full maintenance or high priority fixes > (even if only coordinating) when issues arise. Here's that data, based on > some queries Timo ran recently (thanks, Timo!). > > * en.wikipedia.org, users active since 2015-01-01, skin=cologneblue: 7k > users. > * en.wikipedia.org, users active since 2015-01-01, skin=monobook: 193k > users. > * en.wikipedia.org, users active since 2015-01-01: 3.1m users. > > * en.wikipedia.org, users active since 2015-03-01, skin=cologneblue: 6k > users. > * en.wikipedia.org, users active since 2015-03-01, skin=monobook: 179k > users. > * en.wikipedia.org, users active since 2015-03-01: 2.3m users. > > * commons.wikimedia.org, users active since 2015-03-01, skin=cologneblue: > 1k users. > * commons.wikimedia.org, users active since 2015-03-01, skin=monobook: > 59k users. > * commons.wikimedia.org, users active since 2015-03-01: 687k users. > Expect the ratio of users with obscure configuration settings to sharply rise when you look at groups with higher activity. E.g. a year ago, when I looked up various stats for the MediaViewer launch, non-Vector usage was 5% for users who edited Wikipedia in the last 30 days, and 15% for those who made at least 100 edits in the last 30 days. Non-Monobook usage also grows (over a percent for very active editors).
_______________________________________________ Mobile-l mailing list Mobile-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l
