Agreed. Borrowing a snippet from the earlier discussion on this, and I should have copied this in earlier:
"This is entirely about ... fixing urgent issues that affect production, ideally before they hit it (security issues, deprecated code, etc.). It is not necessarily about doing planning, development, or code review, except in as much as you want to do that and be 'good citizens' in open source and making people happy/*etc.*." Marking SLAs and point people will be a good idea. Regarding the skin sunset concept, glad you pointed out that thread. Will need to review the material. I understand it's complex. On Monday, July 20, 2015, Jon Robson <jdlrob...@gmail.com> wrote: > A SLA and point person for each of these extensions would be a good > next step. I worry that saying the reading vertical maintains the > "Cologne blue" skin sets an expectation that we will be code reviewing > all patches for Modern which is simply untrue. > > This may also be a good time to revisit this thread... > https://www.marc.info/?l=wikitech-l&m=139448582829276&w=3 > > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo) > <nemow...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote: > > Adam Baso, 20/07/2015 22:58: > >> > >> I think we should move the page to mw:Reading/Extension_Responsibility. > > > > > > Or better, merge with > https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Developers/Maintainers > > > > Nemo > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Mobile-l mailing list > > Mobile-l@lists.wikimedia.org <javascript:;> > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l > > > > -- > Jon Robson > * http://jonrobson.me.uk > * https://www.facebook.com/jonrobson > * @rakugojon >
_______________________________________________ Mobile-l mailing list Mobile-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l
