Agreed. That's all I really had to contribute... other than...
It's line 266! :-)
On 7/15/06, GHUM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
SMooney,
> I know it's trivial, but have you tried throwing some alert()'s in
> there to get your bearings?
yes. I started doing this, but that feels so 1999ish, and takes ages.
Having started my programming career on C64, of course there are
methods to track down an error in a 500 line _javascript_: Just keep
cutting it in pieces untill you drop on the error.
Again, takes ages and feels 1980ish. We are in 2006, still > 60% use
Internet Explorer, I simply cannot believe that those dubious error
messages with some funny line are all that is used to debug on that
system.
Harald
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MochiKit" group.
To post to this group, send email to mochikit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mochikit
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
- [mochikit] developing with / for internet explorer GHUM
- [mochikit] Re: developing with / for internet explorer SMooney
- [mochikit] Re: developing with / for internet expl... GHUM
- [mochikit] Re: developing with / for internet ... Steven Mooney
- [mochikit] Re: developing with / for inter... Zachery Bir
- [mochikit] Re: developing with / for ... Steven Mooney
- [mochikit] Re: developing with / for ... Jason Bunting
- [mochikit] Re: developing with / ... Peter Mularien