Ken Williams wrote: > Before I forget to say anything: > > Ask, haven't you set up a basic Mason framework for the *.perl.org sites > that an apache.perl.org could just piggyback onto? Stas, I think that > was why Nat suggested Mason - not that using Mason would necessarily > make anything better itself, but that we could get some leverage from > the other *.perl.org sites, and it could be ultimately less work and > less maintenance and look better without much effort.
Well, I don't know how the *.perl.org sites are maintained. Are they under cvs control for their source files? I have nothing against Mason, the only concerns are being able to control source files without cvs control and I'm not sure how will it work with ASF project being hosted at perl.org. > Nathan Torkington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Stas Bekman writes: >> >>> Everything is under CVS, and if somebody wants to come and give a >>> hand to redo the site, there is no problem to give a cvs access to >>> this person. >> >> >> I'll chew on a new layout and give you something by the end of the >> week. Thanks, >> >> Nat >> > -- _____________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide http://perl.apache.org/guide mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ticketmaster.com http://apacheweek.com http://singlesheaven.com http://perl.apache.org http://perlmonth.com/
