The only thing keeping RegistryNG from being the main version of Registry
(which it will be in the future) is that it hasn't been tested enough by people
like you. So go for it! It's probably going to be a much cleaner way to
proceed than mucking around in Registry.
[This is what Doug has told me, anyway]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chris Nokleberg) wrote:
>I'd like have my registry scripts be cached by their filename after
>resolving symbolic links, and I think subclassing RegistryNG is the
>cleanest way to accomplish this.
>
>Unfortunately, I cannot find any documentation on RegistryNG. Is it ready
>for prime-time, or should I just hack Registry for now?
>
>(using Apache 1.3.9, mod_perl 1.21)
>
>Thanks,
>Chris
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Chris Nokleberg + Internet Sports Network, Inc.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] + http://www.SportsRocket.com/
>
>
------------------- -------------------
Ken Williams Last Bastion of Euclidity
[EMAIL PROTECTED] The Math Forum
