RE: Why does Apache do this braindamaged dlclose/dlopen stuff?

[G.W. Haywood]

Hi there,

On Fri, 21 Jan 2000, Stephen  Anderson wrote:

> > So in the longer term, is there a reason the parent has to contain the
> > interpreter at all?  Can't it just do a system call when it needs one?
> 
> Well, remember that the interpreter itself will remain shared
> throughout, so there's no real disadvantage in having in the parent.

I thought that if the parent was light it could replace its proxy,
which would save a lot of messing about.

> I think the thing to do here is fix the memory leaks 8-)

Can't argue with that.

73,
Ged.