On Wed, 7 Jun 2000, Matt Sergeant wrote: > On Wed, 7 Jun 2000, Eric Cholet wrote: > > > This said, i hurry back to s/"constant strings"/'constant strings'/g; > > Those two are equal. Yes, although it's counter-intutive there's no real performance hit from double-quoting constant strings. The one that bugs me is when I see people doing this: $hash{"$key"} instead of this: $hash{$key} That one is actually in the perlfaq man page, but I still see it all the time. The performance difference is very small but it does exist, and you can get unintended results from stringifying some things. - Perrin
- [performance/benchmark] printing techniques Stas Bekman
- Re: [performance/benchmark] printing techniques Matt Sergeant
- Re: [performance/benchmark] printing techniques Stas Bekman
- Re: [performance/benchmark] printing techniques Eric Cholet
- Re: [performance/benchmark] printing techniq... Eric Strovink
- Re: [performance/benchmark] printing tec... Eric Cholet
- Re: [performance/benchmark] printin... Matt Sergeant
- Re: [OT] Re: [performance/bench... Perrin Harkins
- Re: [OT] Re: [performance/b... Matt Sergeant
- Re: [OT] Re: [performance/b... Perrin Harkins
- Re: [OT] Re: [performance/b... Mike Lambert
- Re: [OT] Re: [performance/b... Matt Sergeant
- Re: [OT] Re: [performance/b... Doug MacEachern
- Re: [performance/benchmark] printing techniq... Matt Sergeant
- Re: [performance/benchmark] printing tec... Stas Bekman
- Re: [performance/benchmark] printing techniq... Barrie Slaymaker
- Re: [performance/benchmark] printing tec... Eric Cholet
- Re: [performance/benchmark] printin... Barrie Slaymaker