On Wed, 7 Jun 2000, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Jun 2000, Eric Cholet wrote:
>
> > This said, i hurry back to s/"constant strings"/'constant strings'/g;
>
> Those two are equal.
Yes, although it's counter-intutive there's no real performance hit
from double-quoting constant strings.
The one that bugs me is when I see people doing this:
$hash{"$key"}
instead of this:
$hash{$key}
That one is actually in the perlfaq man page, but I still see it all the
time. The performance difference is very small but it does exist, and you
can get unintended results from stringifying some things.
- Perrin
- [performance/benchmark] printing techniques Stas Bekman
- Re: [performance/benchmark] printing techniques Matt Sergeant
- Re: [performance/benchmark] printing techniques Stas Bekman
- Re: [performance/benchmark] printing techniques Eric Cholet
- Re: [performance/benchmark] printing techniq... Eric Strovink
- Re: [performance/benchmark] printing tec... Eric Cholet
- Re: [performance/benchmark] printin... Matt Sergeant
- Re: [OT] Re: [performance/bench... Perrin Harkins
- Re: [OT] Re: [performance/b... Matt Sergeant
- Re: [OT] Re: [performance/b... Perrin Harkins
- Re: [OT] Re: [performance/b... Mike Lambert
- Re: [OT] Re: [performance/b... Matt Sergeant
- Re: [OT] Re: [performance/b... Doug MacEachern
- Re: [performance/benchmark] printing techniq... Matt Sergeant
- Re: [performance/benchmark] printing tec... Stas Bekman
- Re: [performance/benchmark] printing techniq... Barrie Slaymaker
- Re: [performance/benchmark] printing tec... Eric Cholet
- Re: [performance/benchmark] printin... Barrie Slaymaker
