First let me say that I'm aware that this topic
comes up with some frequency on the mod_perl and DBI-users list. I am
aware of posts like this one:
which argue against the necessity of pooling.
However, I am also aware of a _major_ ISP that
implements their email system using a _major_ RDBMS that has had problems that
are best solved via connection pooling. Essentially, the time it takes
them to search through all the cached connections is nearly as long as the time
it is taking to read/write to the database. Although, I'm not
implementing email as this ISP is, I think that scalability in my case may
definitely run into similar roadblocks.
I am interested in hearing from anyone that has
tried to implement true connection pooling either within Apache or as an
external process. I'm particularly interested in hearing about
implementations that could be made to work or are done using Perl and
DBI/DBD. I am mostly interested in things that are Open Source or licensed
like Perl itself.
I am aware of a project called Gnu Transaction
Server (GTS), but it doesn't seem like this is quite ready for prime time at the
moment or is even under active development. I've seen posts that hint at
using shared memory and IPC to implement this within Apache as well as posts
that hint at possibilities of implementing this using DBI::Proxy.
I basically want to do what the big TP monitors
(Tuxedo/Encina/CICS) do with respect to condensing connections to a database,
but I'm not in need of features like two-phase commit, cross database joins,
heterogeneous database environment, etc. incorporated in these
products.
Even if you'd simply be interested in working on
such a project, I'd like to hear from you. If you think such a project is
plain stupid, I'd also be interested in hearing from you (but be gentle!).
If you already have something sort of working along these lines, I'd DEFINITELY
be interested in hearing from you!
-- Jeff Horn
|
- Re: Connection Pooling / TP Monitor Jeff Horn
- Re: Connection Pooling / TP Monitor Tim Bunce
- Re: Connection Pooling / TP Monitor Matt Sergeant
- Re: Connection Pooling / TP Monitor Tim Bunce
- Re: Connection Pooling / TP Monitor Matt Sergeant
- Re: Connection Pooling / TP Monitor Tim Bunce
- Re: Connection Pooling / TP Monitor Matt Sergeant
- Re: Connection Pooling / TP Monito... Jeff Horn
- Re: Connection Pooling / TP Monito... Jeff Horn
- Re: Connection Pooling / TP Mo... Matt Sergeant
- Re: Connection Pooling / TP Monitor Les Mikesell