How hard are you pounding it in the 'lab'? I don't remember how hard I
had to pound to break my win32 proxy(NT4,SP4 and Apache 1.3.9 or 11) but
it wasn't all that hard. You should be able to pound pretty hard with an
LWP based pounder.
Ian
On Mon, 13 Nov 2000, siberian wrote:
> Under Win 2k Advanced Server using mod perl and mod proxy we get ok
> results in 'laboratory settings'. How that will translate in the real
> world is anyones guess, most likely poorly.
>
> Thanks
> John-
>
> On Mon, 13 Nov 2000, Ian Struble wrote:
>
> > You can still get alot out of a proxy if you have a win32 box doing
> > heavyweight mod_perl stuff. The only thing is that you need to have it
> > on a different machine because mod_proxy doesn't hack it on a win32
> > machine. I'm sure that you could do it with something other that
> > apache+mod_proxy if you wanted to keep it all on one machine.
> >
> > Actually, I might have been having problems with mod_proxy because of
> > problems in the tcp stack in SP4 that are now fixed in SP6. So you
> > might want to play around a little bit and see if it works.
> >
> > Question for the list -- are we still limited to a single interpretter
> > thread with mod_perl on win32?
> >
> > Ian
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 13 Nov 2000, siberian wrote:
> >
> > > I know I get a lot when I use a lightweight proxy in front of my modperl
> > > servers under UNIX but how about under Win32? Since it uses a different
> > > model does a
> > > reverse proxy really give you that warm and fuzzy feeling or does it just
> > > become another layer between the system and the user?
> > >
> > > I am fairly ignorant of the way Win32 does its threading etc so I ask.
> > >
> > > Thanks for any input
> > >
> > > John Armstrong
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
