Re: Fwd: [speedycgi] Speedycgi scales better than mod_perl withscriptsthat contain un-shared memory

[Gunther Birznieks]

At 10:17 PM 12/22/2000 -0500, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>"Jeremy Howard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>[snipped]
>I posted a patch to modproxy a few months ago that specifically
>addresses this issue.  It has a ProxyPostMax directive that changes
>it's behavior to a store-and-forward proxy for POST data (it also enabled
>keepalives on the browser-side connection if they were enabled on the
>frontend server.)
>
>It does this by buffering the data to a temp file on the proxy before
>opening the backend socket.  It's straightforward to make it buffer to
>a portion of RAM instead- if you're interested I can post another patch
>that does this also, but it's pretty much untested.
Cool! Are these patches now incorporated in the core mod_proxy if we 
download it off the web? Or do we troll through the mailing list to find 
the patch?

(Similar question about the forwarding of remote user patch someone posted 
last year).

Thanks,
     Gunther